Jump to content
FMM Vibe
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
AndersJ

Tactics The Scary Alley 3232 (EME)

Recommended Posts

You want to feel you are alive? Try this Cremonese tactic.

Im altering the defensive measures but find the attack close to perfect giving to average players i could get on loan in the second season.

The feel of the tactic is all out attack. Be very aware of the 3-in-the-front opponents ...🙏😅

Feel free to help me with playing away against the far better sides.

Notes so far

1. The left bbm scores more than the right.

2. All positions are surely importaint but pace is very importaint for the adf.

3. DONT play this tactic 😂

Best regards Anders.

IMG_2992.PNG

IMG_2993.PNG

IMG_2994.PNG

IMG_2995.PNG

IMG_2996.PNG

IMG_2997.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice. 

That’s not too different from my current double trouble tactic:

F75484EA-DC40-4EA6-A5AB-351D7BDDB481.thumb.png.9b2a1745453d9e2e2e6a6e187fb1f46e.png
 

Thsts me trying to get all goals through strikers. I’ve experimented with B2B but want them in a support role for challenge so stick with CM. Wingers for that reason too. I want crosses from them not goals.

If I was to adapt it for normal play I’d probably go B2B and IF like yours.

Edited by MikeF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MikeF said:

Nice. 

That’s not too different from my current double trouble tactic:

F75484EA-DC40-4EA6-A5AB-351D7BDDB481.thumb.png.9b2a1745453d9e2e2e6a6e187fb1f46e.png
 

Thsts me trying to get all goals through strikers. I’ve experimented with B2B but want them in a support role for challenge so stick with CM. Wingers for that reason too. I want crosses from them not goals.

If I was to adapt it for normal play I’d probably go B2B and IF like yours.

Makes really good sense! Does the cms cover you at the back? 

How did your stats go with 2 poachers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, AndersJ said:

Makes really good sense! Does the cms cover you at the back? 

How did your stats go with 2 poachers?

I started off with my wingers as wingbacks but as I look to dominate games I moved them up to where they sit in possession as attacking wingers. Worked well. 
 

CMs do help out a bit with winning the ball back. 
 

Two poachers works for me as going for goals. Have been averaging 80-100 between them each season. 

I even used 3 poachers in last years game for my triple threat. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, MikeF said:

Nice. 

That’s not too different from my current double trouble tactic:

F75484EA-DC40-4EA6-A5AB-351D7BDDB481.thumb.png.9b2a1745453d9e2e2e6a6e187fb1f46e.png
 

Thsts me trying to get all goals through strikers. I’ve experimented with B2B but want them in a support role for challenge so stick with CM. Wingers for that reason too. I want crosses from them not goals.

If I was to adapt it for normal play I’d probably go B2B and IF like yours.

MikeF 

please can you post your team instructions defence/attack 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Fumaca said:

MikeF 

please can you post your team instructions defence/attack 

Cheers

He's doing a challenge with it so those are often kept to themselves for obvious reasons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fumaca said:

Sorry 🤦‍♂️

They’re not too different from the tactic here tbh but when wanting poachers to score they feed off through balls and no shooting on site. 

The original tactic here looks more rounded, mine was for strikers to score  

Not wanting to hijack this thread. Apologies!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, MikeF said:

They’re not too different from the tactic here tbh but when wanting poachers to score they feed off through balls and no shooting on site. 

The original tactic here looks more rounded, mine was for strikers to score  

Not wanting to hijack this thread. Apologies!

No hard feeliings - especially not on valentines 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Remember to read the rules!
Guest Rules
Remember:
  • English only
  • Read everything before posting
  • No spam, abuse, flooding or excessive swearing
  • No discussion about or links to piracy or any unapproved advertising
  • Do not give away personal information such as passwords
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×