Help Need a Tactic for 2 Wingers

[mizal]

need tactic for 2 Wingers, can someone suggest to me, bfore i'm try tactic like this but it's not work, mybe i make mistake on instruction ? 🤔🤔

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[mizal]

just in case u want to know,

this is my Strikers -

 

The Main Striker

 

and The Rotation -

 

also this my Second Striker (ss)

Edited April 26, 2020 by mizal

[mizal]

the Wingers -

Left Ws

 

Right Ws

 

[Woody]

What's not working exactly? 

Not enough assists from wingers or just the tactic in general?

[mizal]

8 minutes ago, Woody said:

What's not working exactly? 

Not enough assists from wingers or just the tactic in general?

yes , assists not from wingers but from my second striker . 

 

 

[Woody]

Swap him for a APM or AM and see if that changes things 1st. It's trial and error mate to be honest

[mizal]

40 minutes ago, Woody said:

Swap him for a APM or AM and see if that changes things 1st. It's trial and error mate to be honest

ok tq. i'll try that 😉👍

[Woody]

You'll find that SS and TQ's are focused positions and a lot of play will go through them (from my experience).

CM's and APM's are the tend to help out rolls and focus more on the overall game again only from experience.

But you need to test around 10 games or so and repeat the same 10 games with a little tweet every time until you get something thats consistent, granted it's time consuming but the reward is far better.

[Dagion]

Adding to Woody I find that if you go for a setup with 5 players horizontally narrow works a treat. 

With that I mean your LW, AP, SS, CM and RW are trying to play wide but there are 5 of them in the midfield line. Also try switching to through balls instead of running at defence.

I would go for DLP, AM/AP and CM for your midfield. Maybe a BBM instead of CM.

Also, IF's still get loads of assists, but take away goals from your striker, not sure what you're going for.

[broodje kip]

@Woody and @Dagion is right. But also could try to change the TM to something less supportive like AF or more offensively a Poacher. They will still use the aerial ability that they got and will less likely to go out position 

[Woody]

4 hours ago, Dagion said:

Adding to Woody I find that if you go for a setup with 5 players horizontally narrow works a treat. 

With that I mean your LW, AP, SS, CM and RW are trying to play wide but there are 5 of them in the midfield line. Also try switching to through balls instead of running at defence.

I would go for DLP, AM/AP and CM for your midfield. Maybe a BBM instead of CM.

Also, IF's still get loads of assists, but take away goals from your striker, not sure what you're going for.

From a small bit of testing if you want to play IF's play them on the side of their strongest foot.....they will move inside less and less inclined to shoot from their weakest foot, but still provide a strong narrow formation as they won't push out wide.

Weirdly you see a lot of people play with wingers but narrow playing style, I've always tried to be balanced and use wingers or IF's to determine how my attack is wide or narrow. It's just a thought really and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesnt.

[Dagion]

1 minute ago, Woody said:

From a small bit of testing if you want to play IF's play them on the side of their strongest foot.....they will move inside less and less inclined to shoot from their weakest foot, but still provide a strong narrow formation as they won't push out wide.

Weirdly you see a lot of people play with wingers but narrow playing style, I've always tried to be balanced and use wingers or IF's to determine how my attack is wide or narrow. It's just a thought really and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesnt.

Last games I played were a more classic 4-1-2-2-1 or 4-3-2-1 with one winger and one IF. Seems about right that they act more like a winger if they're playing on the same side as their strongest foot. Other way around you get a Robben I guess.