Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Recommended Posts

Welcome to Would You Rather! Every week I will think of a Would You Rather question about FMM, sometimes maybe a bit bizarre, and you guys will answer it.

 

The first question is...

Would You Rather have a PL team full of players with 20 for every key attribute for their role, and 1 for the others or 10 for each attribute?

 

Comment your answers below and feel free to explain why if you would like!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

20 + 1 could be a treble winning team. All 10's is guaranteed dugshite. 

 

Actually. Very few roles have stamina as a key attribute, so both teams would probably be guaranteed shite. 

How many players do we get? If we can get 30 some players, option 1.

Edited by hhooo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I'd take the 1 trick ponies. Pretty sure I chuck jack-of-all trade players at almost full potential with 12-13 on everything frequently. I'm not aiming to fight relegation.

That is assuming the hidden attributes like professionalism ain't 1 though.

 

Edited by Meow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d rather try it the 20 for every key attribute, not saying it would work better but that would a lot more interesting to try actually. Be interesting to see how tired they get and quickly 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, hhooo said:

20 + 1 could be a treble winning team. All 10's is guaranteed dugshite. 

 

Actually. Very few roles have stamina as a key attribute, so both teams would probably be guaranteed shite. 

How many players do we get? If we can get 30 some players, option 1.

23 players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Question 2

Would you rather have a INT squad (Expected to reach the World Cup Semifinal) with no players capable of playing as a defender or no players capable of playing as a goalkeeper? (Capable meaning not being any color of the position)

Edited by Chelseaplchamps2022
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defo the team with no defenders, we had to do a challenge of no keeper in the VPL and it was a nightmare, hated it and every shot would go in, at least with the no defenders you can have midfielders in there and they don’t do too bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q1) 20+1s - the save would be more interesting I feel! 

Q2) No defenders. I think I’d find a formation & the right players to play defensively. No natural goalie is always a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Under 19 if this is on FMM, you can get away with a lot more on the game than in real life. I think you’re better off with 32 year olds in real life personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just realised it is about FMM, I doubted myself as I commented earlier 😂

100% under 19s, I always try and start careers with a young squad so they can be around for a few years. I always sell players or swap them as they turn 29/30 as they start to decline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2. No defenders

I can certainly think of formations to cover lack of a proper center back, probably 3 at the back to cover for the fact all 3 can't defend for nuts.

 

3. Under 19s in FMM honestly

Probably a horrible horrible idea in real life though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...