Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Fun/Games FMM Cup 2


BatiGoal
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BatiGoal said:

Quick note, @Sqwagalog has joined us so we now count 13 hopefuls 😁

As things stand ..

 

 

FMM Cup 2 Managers : Leaderboard

(After 1 Round..)

  1.  3 pts - AndersJ
  2.  3 pts - BakaSotong
  3.  3 pts - DanEnglish 
  4.  3 pts - DutchTony
  5.  3 pts - leedsunited87
  6.  3 pts - StuartM
  7.  1 pts - broodje kip
  8.  1 pts - Kun Aguero
  9.  1 pts - Titjes
  10.  0 pts - AtleticoWolves
  11.  0 pts - Chris Rawlings
  12.  0 pts - Kanegan
  13.  0 pts - Sqwagalog

 

Results Round 2 tomorrow.. there was a tie-breaker needed to separate one option from another 😲

 

No tiebraker needed unless its an advantage for me surely 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Just now, DanEnglish said:

Oh dear. Out of interest … did most people pick the same option … ?!

I was waiting for all votes to come in before revealing the results.

Your Votes:

Option A Wingers ( 3-1-2-3-1 )

  • Titjes
  • leedsunited87
  • StuartM
  • AtleticoWolves

 

Option B Wing-Backs ( 3-3-2-1-1 )

  • DutchTony
  • AndersJ
  • Kanegan
  • Sqwagalog

 

Option C Striker Duo ( 3-5-2 )

  • Kun Aguero
  • DanEnglish
  • broodje kip
  • BakaSotong

 

Results Round 2 later today ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, BatiGoal said:

Your Votes:

Wow. Equal votes across each of the 3 options. Unexpected!

Also can’t believe anyone voted for option B - really guys? REALLY?! (If B wins, urgh)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, leedsunited87 said:

You bugger 😆 

😂 Write up isn't done yet, I'm not that evil 😉

6 minutes ago, DanEnglish said:

Wow. Equal votes across each of the 3 options. Unexpected!

Also can’t believe anyone voted for option B - really guys? REALLY?! (If B wins, urgh)

I wish I could reveal things now but I'll have to finish it over lunch 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here it comes ..

 

FMM CUP 2

- Round 2 -

1550871861_Screenshot_20230215-1628272.thumb.png.755ab4731c35dd37e993148a62841101.png

★  - One - Trick - Pony - ★

 

The Results

 

The following stats is the average over 10 games.

 

Option A : Wingers ( 3-1-2-3-1 )

903627165_Screenshot_20230217-1248292.thumb.png.28945a9609b89c28f462d6b3c83309ec.png

  • Wingers (CrA): 23
  • Wingers (CrC): 7
  • Wingers (Ass): 0.5
  • Adv Play (Ass): 0.5
  • Benteke Ass. : 0.4
  • Benteke Gls. : 0.6
  • Benteke GAPG: 1.0*
  • *tie after tie-break

 

Option B : Wing-Backs ( 3-3-2-1-1 )

1643970197_Screenshot_20230217-1320352.thumb.png.00cd105d6d71f981d8782affd91d1e1b.png

  • Wing-Backs (CrA): 38
  • Wing-Backs (CrC): 10
  • Wing-Backs (Ass): 0.7
  • Adv Play (Ass): 0.4
  • Benteke Ass. : 0.3
  • Benteke Gls. : 0.7
  • Benteke GAPG: 1.0*
  • *tie after tie-break

 

Option C : Striker Duo ( 3-5-2 )

977048710_Screenshot_20230217-1529282.thumb.png.06dd3984aa9bbd696ceaf4cfad9f29f4.png

  • Wide-Mids (CrA): 12
  • Wide-Mids (CrC): 4
  • Wide-Mids (Ass): 0.9
  • Adv Play (Ass): 0.7
  • Poacher (G+A): 1.5
  • Benteke Ass. : 1.0
  • Benteke Gls. : 0.4
  • Benteke GAPG: 1.4

 

Option A GAPG: 1.0* : 1 pt (tied with option B)

Option B GAPG: 1.0* 1 pt (tied with option A)

Option C GAPG: 1.4 : 3 pts (winner)

 

Tie-Breaker:

Let me start with explaining the tie-breaker as you're probably wondering what the deal is there. Don't tie-breakers break ties? They certainly do, but I couldn't and didn't want to break the tie in the end. Here's why - so after 10 games Option A and B were tied. I played an additional 10! (=20 games) and still tied. If in this particular instance the differences are that minimal, you know what, no option and manager deserves to lose at this point in my opinion. Hope you guys understand but that's the way I see it. I could play up to another 30 or 40 games and still no winner. So there it is, it's both ending as Runners-Up getting 1pt a piece. No more than both deserve. Hope everyone understands and is happy with that. Option C wins and gets 3pts.

 

Formations:

The main difference between 'A' and 'B' was of course the Wingers v Wing-backs. The former throwing in crosses over a shorter distance. Quality. And the latter over much farther distances but lots more as we were playing over flanks with Early Crosses. Quantity. So the ratio is better for option 'A' but because 'B' threw in so many there's also more completed crosses, thus more assists coming from there. 'A' had slightly more assists coming from AP in turn. Clearly, these balanced each other out.

Option 'C' is the clear winner tho. It looks like the multitude of attacks won it on the day. Every day, unless option 'A' and 'B' get better wide players. Look at the 0.9 assist ratio for the option 'C' WMs. That kinda blew my mind as far fewer crosses completed; 4 per game. From the highlights I noticed through balls - assists - from the WMs as well (and not just crosses) which probably accounts for that high 0.9 ratio. I need more matches to definitively confirm the above, but that's the pattern I observed. Good WMs can be super effective in certain formations. Both APs did quite well too and perhaps the Poacher was what made Benteke truly shine. Having a solid goal-scorer beside him made the difference in getting 1 assist / game in. So fewer goals scored than 'A' and 'B' but many more goal involvements overall. A deserving winner in the end.

 

FMM Cup 2 Managers : Leaderboard

(Round 2/10 completed)

  1.  6 pts - BakaSotong
  2.  6 pts - DanEnglish
  3.  4 pts - AndersJ
  4.  4 pts - broodje kip
  5.  4 pts - DutchTony
  6.  4 pts - Kun Aguero
  7.  4 pts - leedsunited87
  8.  4 pts - StuartM
  9.  2 pts - Titjes
  10.  1 pts - AtleticoWolves
  11.  1 pts - Kanegan
  12.  1 pts - Sqwagalog
  13.  0 pts - Chris Rawlings
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. What a round!

Firstly I can’t believe you played that one match FIFTY times in total 😲 dedication.

Secondly what a great write up, sharing both stats + descriptions 👍👍👍 insightful.

Nicely done Bati 👏 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DanEnglish said:

Wow. What a round!

Firstly I can’t believe you played that one match FIFTY times in total 😲 dedication.

Secondly what a great write up, sharing both stats + descriptions 👍👍👍 insightful.

Nicely done Bati 👏 

Thanks, hope you guys enjoyed that. Yes, after 50 games I thought, yeah screw this lol. Next round will be a bit easier. For me, perhaps not for you guys 😆 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, BatiGoal said:

Here it comes ..

 

FMM CUP 2

- Round 2 -

1550871861_Screenshot_20230215-1628272.thumb.png.755ab4731c35dd37e993148a62841101.png

★  - One - Trick - Pony - ★

 

The Results

 

The following stats is the average over 10 games.

 

Option A : Wingers ( 3-1-2-3-1 )

903627165_Screenshot_20230217-1248292.thumb.png.28945a9609b89c28f462d6b3c83309ec.png

  • Wingers (CrA): 23
  • Wingers (CrC): 7
  • Wingers (Ass): 0.5
  • Adv Play (Ass): 0.5
  • Benteke Ass. : 0.4
  • Benteke Gls. : 0.6
  • Benteke GAPG: 1.0*
  • *tie after tie-break

 

Option B : Wing-Backs ( 3-3-2-1-1 )

1643970197_Screenshot_20230217-1320352.thumb.png.00cd105d6d71f981d8782affd91d1e1b.png

  • Wing-Backs (CrA): 38
  • Wing-Backs (CrC): 10
  • Wing-Backs (Ass): 0.7
  • Adv Play (Ass): 0.4
  • Benteke Ass. : 0.3
  • Benteke Gls. : 0.7
  • Benteke GAPG: 1.0*
  • *tie after tie-break

 

Option C : Striker Duo ( 3-5-2 )

977048710_Screenshot_20230217-1529282.thumb.png.06dd3984aa9bbd696ceaf4cfad9f29f4.png

  • Wide-Mids (CrA): 12
  • Wide-Mids (CrC): 4
  • Wide-Mids (Ass): 0.9
  • Adv Play (Ass): 0.7
  • Poacher (G+A): 1.5
  • Benteke Ass. : 1.0
  • Benteke Gls. : 0.4
  • Benteke GAPG: 1.4

 

Option A GAPG: 1.0* : 1 pt (tied with option B)

Option B GAPG: 1.0* 1 pt (tied with option A)

Option C GAPG: 1.4 : 3 pts (winner)

 

Tie-Breaker:

Let me start with explaining the tie-breaker as you're probably wondering what the deal is there. Don't tie-breakers break ties? They certainly do, but I couldn't and didn't want to break the tie in the end. Here's why - so after 10 games Option A and B were tied. I played an additional 10! (=20 games) and still tied. If in this particular instance the differences are that minimal, you know what, no option and manager deserves to lose at this point in my opinion. Hope you guys understand but that's the way I see it. I could play up to another 30 or 40 games and still no winner. So there it is, it's both ending as Runners-Up getting 1pt a piece. No more than both deserve. Hope everyone understands and is happy with that. Option C wins and gets 3pts.

 

Formations:

The main difference between 'A' and 'B' was of course the Wingers v Wing-backs. The former throwing in crosses over a shorter distance. Quality. And the latter over much farther distances but lots more as we were playing over flanks with Early Crosses. Quantity. So the ratio is better for option 'A' but because 'B' threw in so many there's also more completed crosses, thus more assists coming from there. 'A' had slightly more assists coming from AP in turn. Clearly, these balanced each other out.

Option 'C' is the clear winner tho. It looks like the multitude of attacks won it on the day. Every day, unless option 'A' and 'B' get better wide players. Look at the 0.9 assist ratio for the option 'C' WMs. That kinda blew my mind as far fewer crosses completed; 4 per game. From the highlights I noticed through balls - assists - from the WMs as well (and not just crosses) which probably accounts for that high 0.9 ratio. I need more matches to definitively confirm the above, but that's the pattern I observed. Good WMs can be super effective in certain formations. Both APs did quite well too and perhaps the Poacher was what made Benteke truly shine. Having a solid goal-scorer beside him made the difference in getting 1 assist / game in. So fewer goals scored than 'A' and 'B' but many more goal involvements overall. A deserving winner in the end.

 

FMM Cup 2 Managers : Leaderboard

(Round 2/10 completed)

  1.  6 pts - BakaSotong
  2.  6 pts - DanEnglish
  3.  4 pts - AndersJ
  4.  4 pts - broodje kip
  5.  4 pts - DutchTony
  6.  4 pts - Kun Aguero
  7.  4 pts - leedsunited87
  8.  4 pts - StuartM
  9.  2 pts - Titjes
  10.  1 pts - AtleticoWolves
  11.  1 pts - Kanegan
  12.  1 pts - Sqwagalog
  13.  0 pts - Chris Rawlings

Thanks Bati, well done for keeping on even after 50 games, great dedication.

Ok start for me I guess, I'm hoping for improvement from myself in the future though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, leedsunited87 said:

I'm very surprised he managed to actually find the net! 

We got roughly 10 penalties during those 50 games, I can remember him scoring 2 only. I wish I could say I've seen worse 🤣

52 minutes ago, Sqwagalog said:

Thanks Bati, well done for keeping on even after 50 games, great dedication.

Ok start for me I guess, I'm hoping for improvement from myself in the future though!

Thanks, it's also good to see everyone (those participating that is) on the points 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Round 3 shall be posted soon. People may still join the fun. Pls read OP for more details.. 

Here's already a teaser of what's awaiting you. I'm pretty sure you can guess what that's going to be about. 

 

FMM CUP 2

- Round 3 -

111071915_Screenshot_20230218-1435322.thumb.png.af36a146fd4f8398c6adefc76b7a9271.png

  All About The Team 

 

Stay Tuned..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, AndersJ said:

@BatiGoal could you by Any chance make it more it more up to chance, than up to tactical skills so that @DanEnglishcannot win on his tactical knowledge 😛🤣😁😆???

just a simple request from a simply man 🤠

Anders - you dropped from 1st to 3rd. I’m only in 2nd. We are just two rounds in. There’s plenty of time for both of us to fail!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, DanEnglish said:

Nil points for me then 🤔 I have no idea 🤷‍♂️ 

Ok, 0 pts given 😀

2 hours ago, AndersJ said:

@BatiGoal could you by Any chance make it more it more up to chance, than up to tactical skills so that @DanEnglishcannot win on his tactical knowledge 😛🤣😁😆???

just a simple request from a simply man 🤠

The next round requires no tactical skill whatsoever, it's just sense and a bit of luck. Everyone should do ok 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

FMM CUP 2

- Round 3 -

111071915_Screenshot_20230218-1435322.thumb.png.af36a146fd4f8398c6adefc76b7a9271.png

  All About The Team 

 

 

Bordeaux

A beautiful city, very tasteful wine, and a fantastic club. Bordeaux are in deep crisis now, there's no denying in that. 1x UEFA Intertoto Cup Winners, 4x French Cup Winners and 6x Ligue 1 Winners. However, these former French Champions are now playing ball in Ligue 2. Such great historical club deserves to be playing in one division only and that's the top one. We're not going to play an entire season, but we're going to help them take a giant leap into the right direction. 

They have a very decent squad worthy of promotion. The only thing that's lacking is, you guessed it, a man with Leadership who leads them the way. A man who makes the right Decisions at the right time - who isn't selfish and is all about Teamwork. An Experienced man who's in the right Position on the grass to make a great Captain.

 

This reminds me of a friend's quote years ago ..

Quote

Back when the game was on the PSP there used to be rumours that whatever position the captain you selected was then the players in the same position as him felt the benefits and their performances improved.

So if you chose a forward with high leadership then it would have a positive impact on the rest of your front 2-3. No idea whether it was true or not but worth mentioning.

Are you starting to have doubts yet, that's just the beginning..

 

The Starting 11 ( 4-5-1 )

(Team Rating = 6.8 without option A,B,C)

Spoiler

Goal Keeper

Screenshot_20230218-202929.thumb.png.d5170abb7cbe48da24a47068d200d87f.png

Defenders

Screenshot_20230218-203003.thumb.png.15e1cb6f1faedbc31aeb8ad256b3fbb9.png

Screenshot_20230218-202957.thumb.png.b314ddadd8b88e7711183643d230c069.png

Screenshot_20230218-202949.thumb.png.47c6cb673c70f44eb98251cdb7097619.png

Screenshot_20230218-202940.thumb.png.5ff2fdfbb790effb6104d233b7e566fa.png

Midfielders

Screenshot_20230218-203420.thumb.png.0831ccc15ebe10e94a2b975d762e0a31.png

Screenshot_20230218-203055.thumb.png.571a5706c5dd756ec08830154a3cfcf3.png

Screenshot_20230218-203042.thumb.png.83e45c3e2c233c31f2e282e73577c673.png

Screenshot_20230218-203035.thumb.png.427c89758168de0256be307c80b7354b.png

Screenshot_20230218-203029.thumb.png.d6dc26a49d4854d121b297b5afcd8d57.png

Forward

Screenshot_20230218-203048.thumb.png.e3d885fec608b9d5fae35d78c189830c.png

 

Twist - no so much of a twist, more if a reminder. Bringing in a Captain means removing a player from the starting 11 in that same position. So not only is it a case of who's the best Captain, it's equally a case of which removed player weakens the team least. Goodluck figuring that out.

 

Option : Captain Campaña (GK)

IN - Campaña

1340223562_Screenshot_20230218-2319052.thumb.png.da235364828136ed551a1baf5c3d9b80.png

OUT - Poussin

1524551163_Screenshot_20230218-2029292.thumb.png.e119486d3bb6acc0eb6e6f27586bcb95.png

Campaña: Personal Info + Coach Report

Spoiler

967636097_Screenshot_20230219-0958192.thumb.png.e647ce14048b3aa5952a33378627b4fd.png

189989320_Screenshot_20230219-0955532.thumb.png.9d3f72cdcb275725ca9688c9b34cac11.png

 

Option : Captain Réver (CB)

IN - Réver

1658243799_Screenshot_20230218-2333392.thumb.png.f904fd8ecc18cb9ee964262bd6dc4040.png

OUT - Mwanga

1589906601_Screenshot_20230218-2030032.thumb.png.3c53eb91fe8a2cdf19e860e2ea37486c.png

Réver: Personal Info + Coach Report

Spoiler

1515106138_Screenshot_20230219-0956122.thumb.png.33001bd5503249be12a9bec5f1f72ae2.png

1264810897_Screenshot_20230219-0956332.thumb.png.7145855db0eb23dfa38e010cb1cfd98f.png

 

Option : Captain Blaszczykowski (AMR)

IN - Blaszczykowski

1538293134_Screenshot_20230218-2325072.thumb.png.b08bff6a7511dbcd95f84c5570a60b91.png

OUT - Oudin

982202437_Screenshot_20230218-2034202.thumb.png.d25bd556cdae2a0ca77e7537732a1eec.png

Blaszczykowski: Personal Info + Coach Report

Spoiler

1074174538_Screenshot_20230219-0956562.thumb.png.730b541171fe2a66a138d382d9d08d3a.png

2028032436_Screenshot_20230219-0957112.thumb.png.f13bd20eb76c07ba389781ae940ee62e.png

 

For each of the 3 options above, I shall be playing Bordeaux vs the same opponent 10 times featuring Captain A, B and C. I will then calculate the average Team Rating for each of the 3 options. The highest Team Rating over 10 games wins. 

Everything else such as formation, tactics, player roles etc, shall be identical for all 3 options. Which option (A, B or C) do you think gets Bordeaux the highest Team Rating? -> You may discuss the 3 options at length in this thread but do NOT reveal your answer. * PM me the answer! *

Link to comment
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BatiGoal said:

Ok, 0 pts given 😀

The next round requires no tactical skill whatsoever, it's just sense and a bit of luck. Everyone should do ok 😂

My kind of game :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, StuartM said:

Interesting that none can speak French 🤔

I guess it will be a case of leading by example

Leading by example... to victory or defeat? 😁

3 hours ago, DanEnglish said:

Ah. This one is a hard one. Urgh.

Nice bluff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, BatiGoal said:

Nice bluff.

Haha. No - genuinely this is the hardest one so far. For me it’s a coin toss between two of the options. Though there’s one option which surely no-one will vote for … right? … RIGHT?! 🙃

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BakaSotong said:

Ah shit, MB. Voting now, sorry for the wait y'all.

Well within time, no worries. 👍

 

Your Votes:

Option : Captain Campaña (GK)

  • Kun Aguero
  • AtleticoWolves
  • BakaSotong

 

Option : Captain Réver (CB)

  • AndersJ
  • Kanegan
  • Sqwagalog
  • Titjes
  • StuartM
  • DanEnglish

 

Option : Captain Blaszczykowski (AMR)

  • leedsunited87
  • broodje kip
  • DutchTony
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn’t sure whether to go with option A or B - as both seemed like upgrades.

However am surprised anyone went for option C - while the old guy is a better leader, he seems to be a downgrade in terms of player ability + suitability. I’d assume that extra leadership + personality is useful, it wouldn’t compensate for the downgrade in ability over just 1 match. Surprised. 

@leedsunited87 / @broodje kip / @DutchTony - can you share your logic / feelings of why you went with option C ? To educate the rest of us 🙂 

Edited by DanEnglish
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...